Treatment strategy based on prognostic groups according to risk features and treatment response for pediatric de novo AML

Treatment strategy based on prognostic groups according to risk features and treatment response for pediatric de novo AML

Treatment strategy based on prognostic groups according to risk features and treatment response for pediatric de novo AML

(구연):
Release Date : 2013. 10. 18(금)
Keon Hee Yoo¹, Soo Hyun Lee¹, Ki Woong Sung¹, Hong Hoe Koo¹, Jae Wook Lee², Nack-Gyun Chung², Bin Cho², Hack-Ki Kim², Hee-Jo Baek³, Hoon Kook³
¹Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ²Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ³Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hopital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
Keon Hee Yoo¹, Soo Hyun Lee¹, Ki Woong Sung¹, Hong Hoe Koo¹, Jae Wook Lee², Nack-Gyun Chung², Bin Cho², Hack-Ki Kim², Hee-Jo Baek³, Hoon Kook³
¹Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ²Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ³Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hopital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

Abstract

Purpose: This multicenter pilot study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility of new treatment protocol based on risk stratification for newly diagnosed pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: Acute promyelocytic leukemia and AML of Down syndrome were not eligible. Risk features were defined as follows: 1) low risk features (LRF): inv(16)/t(16;16), t(8;21) without c-kit mutation, or with normal karyotype in the presence of NPM1 or CEBPA mutation without FLT3/ITD mutation; 2) high risk features (HRF): -5, 5q-, -7, 3q abnormalities, t(8;16), t(6;9), t(16;21), t(6;11), t(10;11), complex karyotype, or FLT3/ITD mutation; 3) standard risk features (SRF): all the others. A new chemotherapy regimen was developed which consisted of 2 induction and 4 consolidation cycles. Treatment responses were determined according to the marrow response at the end of each induction as good response (CR-CR), delayed response-1 ( PR [blast 5~15%]-CR), delayed response-2 (NR [blast>15%]-CR), refractory ( PR/NR-PR/NR), and early relapse. Patients were allocated into either favorable (FG), intermediate (IG), or poor ( PG) prognostic group considering both risk features and treatment response. Patients in FG were not candidates for transplantation. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. One patient (2.9%) had CNS leukemia and 8 patients (23.5%) had chloroma. There were 8 patients (23.5%) with LRF, 16 (47.1%) with SRF, and 10 (29.4%) with HRF. The overall CR rate following 2 cycles of induction was 96.7%. Among 30 patients who completed 2 cycles of induction, 8 patients (26.7%) belong to FG, 13 (43.3%) to IG, and 9 (30%) to PG. Neutropenic fever and blood stream infection developed in 64~97% and 12~29% of patients during each chemotherapy cycle, while there was no proven invasive fungal infection. Eleven patients underwent allo-HSCT. With a median follow-up of 10 mo, the estimated 1-y overall survival and event-free survival were 100% and 89%, respectively. One patient relapsed after completion of chemotherapy and the other one relapsed after transplantation. There was no treatment-related mortality. Conclusion: Although the follow-up duration is short, our new treatment protocol based on risk stratification seems safe and effective. We suggest a nationwide prospective multicenter trial to further test the feasibility of this strategy for pediatric de novo AML.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, pediatric, risk stratification